cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing from the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his over mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined via the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
A survey of PACER people, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and determined areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of your U.S. Courts is using the survey results To guage and prioritize upcoming changes to PACER services and capabilities.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and given that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to make it proper to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over one plus a 50 % year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may avoid standing trial and consequently delay read more the prosecution of the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions towards the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge towards the Judgment within time. Read more
department concerned shall give the complete list of ACRs with the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The scrupulous reader could have noticed something earlier mentioned: a flaw. Past the first seven words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two essential elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified researchers to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.